Summit Home

Bob Merritt Responds to Session 1

Hi, it's Kristen again! I'm excited to introduce the first of our guest bloggers to you. We have invited some awesome leaders and influencers to offer their thoughts on each of our sessions.  We are honored to have their perspectives, and we invite you to share your own comments as well. 

Let me introduce to you Bob Merritt. He has been the senior pastor of Eagle Brook Church since 1991, leading the church through a period of explosive growth, now with a main church campus in Lino Lakes, MN and a video venue in White Bear Lake, MN. 

Here are Bob’s thoughts:
My first blush response to Bill’s opening talk is that, when I heard Bill raise the value of “Process,” it surprised me but resonated with me. We leaders do hate process, but it’s in the process where people gain buy in, where you see things from others you would never think of or see. We’ve suffered greatly from not doing process well, whether it’s making program or staff changes. When we don’t do process well, people get hurt, mad, offended, and devalued. Then Bill’s absolutely right. You don’t get owners.
It’s scary, I think, to open your ideas and vision up to key leaders and staff. “This is my baby,” we think, “Don’t mess with it.” But, now, we even submit our weekend messages to team process. I certainly hear from God in ways that other staff and other leaders don’t. So when it comes to vision, I still need to hear from God. That’s where the vision starts, I believe. I think Bill would agree with that. But the whole idea of letting others weigh in and process that vision with you is a new take on it. And I absolutely agree with getting away with your key leaders and staff for a retreat and letting them in on what you think God is telling you. We do this every year, and it certainly begins with me, but then we spend two days together talking about it, refining it, poking holes in it. By the time we’re done, we have huge buy in, and I have the confidence that we’re heading down the right trail. The one area that I’d offer, by way of a challenge to Bill’s talk, is that he mentioned that this was an 18-month vision deal for the next five years. I think there are strategic seasons when a church has to look at their five-year deal and take 18 months to create the vision. When you’re going to build a $100 million dollar facility, you need a five-year plan with 18 months to develop and refine. But there are also annual visions that don’t, and can’t, take 18 months to develop. It takes two or three months to develop, and the amount of groups you test fly it on will be fewer.  In short, the size of the vision determines the length of the process.  Also, when you invite people into the vision process, make sure they’re the right people. Far too many visions are killed by people who are visionless and gutless. Invite people into the vision process who have courage, integrity, and are in support of kingdom work and your leadership.
 Kristen here, back with some questions for you. So, what do you think?  Do you wrestle with opening up your vision to leaders on your team?  How have you navigated through that?   What do you think about Bob’s thoughts on how the size of the vision determines the length of the process?  Your turn!

 

Published 09 August 2007 06:20 PM by Kristen Aikman
Filed under: , , , ,

Email Post

Comments

# Gary Winsor said on 10 August, 2007 10:08 AM
I was greatly encouraged by Bill's opening presentation. Knowing that this is a team process is liberating and helps share the burden. From a church perspective, I believe it is very important. Churches frequently have pastoral changes every 5-15 years. This is the reality despite the fact the long term leadership is desirable. If the vision is not owned by the local leadership, vision will change with every new pastor. This will be very confusing to the membership. When the local leadership is a part of the vision process, a new pastor can be selected in keeping with the determined direction of the church.
Email Comment  |  Notify As Inappropriate
# Ryan Bowman said on 10 August, 2007 10:28 AM
Thank you Bill for reminding us that "ownership" is vital in moving forward as a organization. If people are not engaged the goal, the direction, become a mandate and not a motivator. When we allow others to experience the need, see the vision, and contribute to the solution we see people excited and dedicated to the cause. More importantly, we see people grow toward their potential in life and in Christ.
Email Comment  |  Notify As Inappropriate
# Bryan Guthire said on 10 August, 2007 11:43 AM
Bill mentioned the PROCESS of creating a new vision for Willow but I can't seem to remember the three points of your new vision. Could you post those for me? I know it had to do with risk and compassion. I looked on the willowcreek.org website but couldn't find it anywhere. Thanks.
Email Comment  |  Notify As Inappropriate
# Chris Meirose said on 10 August, 2007 02:41 PM
I love what Bob has for insight into the need for the right people being brought into that vision process. The right people will help you with clarity by asking tough questions, and challenging you on muddy points. Doing this work up front saves an exponentially larger effort later, and greatly reduces the chance of failure. Kinda like what Jim Collins talks about, not only having the right people on the bus, but the right people in the right seats. Chris Meirose
Email Comment  |  Notify As Inappropriate
# Joe Redmond III said on 10 August, 2007 09:43 PM
Bryan asked for the 3 points in Bill's opening session. I took extensive notes. Here's what I got: 1) VISION FORMATION Bill shared 2 examples, either the Mount Sinai approach or the Team Approach. While the Team approach is slow and challenging because it is a process, their is a higher likelihood of ownership or buy-in. 2) VISION REFINEMENT As the vision is processed, it's like brainstorming to the first draft stage. Then as it takes shape, Bill suggested we take it to the various stakeholders or people groups. "It's like wet cement" at this stage. Questions to ask are: - What should be added or taken away? - What is unclear or vague? - How can I make it more powerful? 3) VISION DECLARATION During this stage, Bill "test flew" it with staff and key teammembers. He asked questions like: - What the introduction compelling? - Can you remember my 3 or 4 main points... where they powerful? - Does this vision raise the risk level and will it make us re-think how we coach and equip people? Hope that helped!
Email Comment  |  Notify As Inappropriate
# Darren Niesley said on 12 August, 2007 11:11 AM
Bryan, I think you were referring to Willow's vision, rather than the points of Bill's Session 1 talk. I don't remember it word for word from the session, but this is what Bill presented to the Willow congregation earlier this year: 1) Raise the level of risk associated with reaching people far from God. 2) Rethink the coaching we give Christ followers in the development of their own spiritual growth. 3) Unleash unprecedented levels of compassion. Of these 3, the second one is not quite as self-explanatory as the first and third. This might be over simplifying it, but it is about teaching Christians to develop their personal worship and study abilities so that they can feed themselves as they mature spiritually. I am excited about this three-part vision. Hope this helps you.
Email Comment  |  Notify As Inappropriate

Leave a Comment

(required) 
Email(required) 
(optional)




(required) 

Please enter the code above:
Thu | Fri | Sat
Bill Hybels
Carly Fiorina
Floyd H. Flake
Marcus Buckingham
Summit Schedule
 
The Leadership Store
 
The Leadership Store
 
Summit Programming
 
Summit FAQ
 
Register for 2008
 
Feedback on Website
 
Email your Summit photos here
 
 
   
WCA
Photos
Attenders'
Photos