The Future of Drama in the Church

I just spent a long lunch (our quarterly Chicago area Brown Bag Lunch) with arts leaders from local churches exploring the future of drama in the church.  There are some who wonder, or loudly declare, that drama is no longer culturally relevant in a worship setting.  We discussed whether this might be the conclusion some make after they experience drama done poorly in the church.  Most often, people choose to abandon an art form because they haven't been moved by it.  Then we simplify our thinking and conclude, "Drama in the church doesn't work."  Drama doesn't work anywhere, in film, live theatre, or on television, when it is done with mediocrity.  So we agreed we need to take a look at the quality of our efforts in church drama - are we only doing drama as often as we can do it well?
      Our dialogue featured the thoughts of Eric Bramlett, Creative Director of Community Christian Church in Naperville, and Steve Pederson, Drama Director of Willow Creek Barrington.  Both of these guys are passionate about theatre, and always seeking new ways to incorporate story and scenes either live on stage or through video for our congregations.  Community Christian is a multi-site church (9 locations!) that has in recent months chosen to capture scenes on video for all of its campuses rather than attempting to perform the scene live in each one.  At Willow, we still do live drama but are also combining our efforts on occasion with the video team in the creation of live video/film pieces.  We all agreed that the Church needs to continually experiment with the use of drama, and discover whatever fresh approaches we can bring to this art form that has been effective for literally thousands of years.
      Eric is a huge advocate for humor in the church.  Humor is life-giving and for most people, unexpected in a church service.  But doing humor well is enormously difficult.  Whatever we can do to test out a potential script in a smaller setting, to keep revising it, work on the pacing, and hone the work is well worth the effort.  Throughout our conversation, everyone agreed that the quality of a script - whether for comedy or serious drama - is essential to anything having a shot at connecting.
      At the end of our time, I think the consensus was that while using drama is a tremendous challenge, it is a vital tool of communication that we don't want to lose.  Certainly our culture is as captivated as ever by live theatre, film, and television.  We must commit ourselves to building effective drama ministries slowly and intentionally.  Don't assume that "anyone can do it."  Just as we would not allow just anyone to sing or preach, we must search for gifted people who know something about the theatre craft and will pursue using those gifts with authenticity and excellence in the church.  When drama is done well...there's nothing quite like it.  So I say, let's not give up on this art form!  I'd love to know what you think...

 

Published 20 September 2008 08:18 AM by Nancy Beach
Filed under: ,

Comments

# Sandy Johnson said on 30 September, 2008 06:08 PM
Drama was my first love when I entered the world of worship arts. The thought of directing scenes that moved the hearts of people, helping them admit the humor and pain with which we all experience life, was a gripping thought. And I've directed drama in the church for almost 20 years, alongside my other arts leadership responsibilities. But time moves on and the bar for drama in the world, much less in the church, has been raised so high that writing, directing and delivering a dramatic moment can be intimidating. (Just flip the channel to any television station that plays shows from 20 years ago and then flip back to a network station during primetime, and you’ll see what I mean.) While the live dramatic experience is something you cannot replicate, drama does work on video too. And with the advent of the media culture and the increasing use of technology in the church, we have opportunities to capture dramatic scenes in new ways. And we can intermix drama with multiple art forms when we utilize video, enhancing its power. While I won't give up on live drama in the church, I will choose to use it sparingly. And, I’m exploring moving our great scripts to the video screen.
Email Comment  |  Notify As Inappropriate
# Jeff Morgan said on 30 September, 2008 06:21 PM
I agree with your statement “when drama is done well… there is nothing quite like it.” Yet, like any art, there is a subjectivity that defines what is good. And that subjectivity resides inside an environment of expectation – where good is as compared to… what? Culturally North Americans have access to hundreds of cable channels and watch movies with multimillion dollar budgets, (statistics surrounding hours of viewing per day are disturbing). Can live drama compete? This art form has been effect for thousands of years, with little else like it in terms of entertainment or competition. And certainly, acting will live on, but the expectation now includes the “close up.” In that all drama requires the suspension of disbelief, has the modern media consumer lost the willingness to suspend, when a video can bring them anywhere, at any angle, with better effects and a sound track? Isn’t the purpose of drama in the church… to enhance the message, to best connect people with the emotion and humanity of a given subject. If this is its purpose, can it be more effective than a film? I mean, given the nature of the viewer (acclimated to screen over live performances) would it not be better to video-produce all of what would be otherwise acted out live? Again, let me say I agree… “when drama is done well” – but how high is the bar set? And what does it take to accomplish… what might be more easily done on screen?
Email Comment  |  Notify As Inappropriate
# Deb Meyer said on 30 September, 2008 07:49 PM
Seeing that I am currently in the process of writing and editing a book of 15 Sunday Shorts (dramas) I am relieved to read your insight regarding the future of drama in the church. Poor drama should never be an option. Both a well-crafted sketch as well as a gifted director and actors are needed to create the desired challenge and impact. In the past we have effectively used both live dramas as well as a video format. The advantage to video of course is being able to shoot and edit to perfection, however I still find a live performance to be most powerful, as it is a shift from all the visual media we are so accustomed to.
Email Comment  |  Notify As Inappropriate
# Matt Fabbri said on 01 October, 2008 10:12 AM
This is my 3rd year as a Drama Director in a staff position but my 8th overall and for a 26 year old, I've seen my fair-share of poorly done drama. I agree with Deb that you can edit those video shorts to perfection but in the end, as an actor, there is nothing like connecting with your audiences in a live setting. I'll show Nancy's blog to my company of actors in a few days at our bi-weekly meeting to see what they think of her thoughts, but I already know what they're going to say - "How can drama NOT be relevant?!" (I know they're slightly biased, but still). Drama is a reflection of reality - it is our opportunity to hold a mirror up to our congregations and say, "Is this you?" or "Wake up! This IS you!" or "Have you thought about this?" or "Have you seen it this way?" That's something that is harder for other artistic expressions to do - especially when you try to create the moment using comedy. I wholeheartedly agree with Nancy - comedy is SO important! It breaks down walls! It relaxes people! It says, "Its okay to laugh in church". I didn't always want to bring comedy in - I do like my dramatic moments on stage with lots of tension and conflict ... I'm one of those guys who LOVES the ending of Hamlet (lots of conflict there!) ... but there's something about comedy - is it hard? Yeah. Is it a painstaking process to get it right? A lot of times, yeah. But the rewards ... oh the rewards! Priceless! ... And for everything else, there's Mastercard.
Email Comment  |  Notify As Inappropriate